Questions about NCAP_CEH and FLO_SHAR in VEDA-FE
#16
(12-05-2020, 02:42 PM)Antti-L Wrote: I think Amit asked for the file where defining the bound type as "LO" under the LimType column does not seem to work, but you see FX instead in the Browser. Are you sure that LO in the example you provided does not work?

I tried the example you provided (with the DEMO model), and obtained LimType=LO both with just using ~FI_T (and so when not adding it to the tag ~FI_T: LO):

[Image: attachment.php?aid=114]


 I am sure it didn't work on my PC. Could show me your TFM_UPD table about Share in syssetting file? I want to compare with my setting and check if there is something wrong. And I will try again, thank you!
Reply
#17
Hmm... I don't quite understand. Why do you ask about my TFM_UPD table about Share in syssetting file?  You said the problem was about ~FI_T table, where you specified LO in the the Limtype column.  And the example file you provided only contained such a ~FI_T table.

The ~TFM_UPD table in Syssettings is used only for defining default interpolation options.  It does not affect the original parameters defined via ~FI_T tables. So, it only adds interpolation options into the SysSettings scenario.
Reply
#18
(13-05-2020, 01:32 PM)Antti-L Wrote: Hmm... I don't quite understand. Why do you ask about my TFM_UPD table about Share in syssetting file?  You said the problem was about ~FI_T table, where you specified LO in the the Limtype column.  And the example file you provided only contained such a ~FI_T table.

The ~TFM_UPD table in Syssettings is used only for defining default interpolation options.  It does not affect the original parameters defined via ~FI_T tables. So, it only adds interpolation options into the SysSettings scenario.


Ok, I thought they were related. I know it is a mistake now. I will try again to find the mistake in my FI_T table. Thank you!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)