|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: ~TFM_DINS table which is not read
Post: RE: ~TFM_DINS table which is not read
| Thanks a lot! I tried and it worked :-) |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
3 |
185 |
16-11-2023, 12:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ~TFM_DINS table which is not read
Post: ~TFM_DINS table which is not read
| Hello,
I have a ~TFM_DINS table in a scenario file that is not read by the model. I don't get any error or any other type of messages when I sync the file with the rest of the model in Veda 2.0 (ve... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
3 |
185 |
15-11-2023, 07:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
Post: RE: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTU...
|
Antti-L Wrote: (19-10-2023, 09:19 PM)
--
Looking at your set of *.DD files again, I found one interesting anomaly in one of the older DD files that were included in the ZIP file.
Based on that, I ha... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
11 |
1,015 |
20-10-2023, 03:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
Post: RE: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTU...
|
Antti-L Wrote: (17-10-2023, 04:59 PM)
--
Ok, I see, thanks.
With this much information, it does look strange to me, and I am not able to tell what is going on. I would quickly find out what the p... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
11 |
1,015 |
17-10-2023, 05:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
Post: RE: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTU...
|
Antti-L Wrote: (16-10-2023, 08:08 PM)
--
Ok, the picture shows that the PCG is defined as NRG, and the trade process is between regions HEM and KLM, trading the commodity ELCELC.
If I understand c... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
11 |
1,015 |
17-10-2023, 04:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
Post: RE: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTU...
|
Antti-L Wrote: (16-10-2023, 07:23 PM)
--
There is something wrong about the process Primary Commodity Group. Are you using VEDA?
If you are, can you post a screenshot from the Item Details view fo... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
11 |
1,015 |
16-10-2023, 07:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
Post: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
| Hello,
I get the following "FATAL ERROR" for my trade processes.
*** Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
*10 FATAL ERROR - No way to identify PCG: R=HEM P=TB_ELCEL... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
11 |
1,015 |
16-10-2023, 07:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
Post: Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
| Hello,
I get the following "FATAL ERROR" for my trade processes.
*** Process with missing or mismatched CG/PRC_ACTUNIT
*10 FATAL ERROR - No way to identify PCG: R=HEM P=TB_ELCEL... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
0 |
109 |
16-10-2023, 07:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TFM_UPD table
Post: RE: TFM_UPD table
|
AKanudia Wrote: (28-12-2021, 03:25 PM)
--
I confirm that the last value declared will survive. This is true for any INS/UPD/MIG table.
--
I tested and it worked perfectly! :)
Thanks a lot for y... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
18 |
16,160 |
28-12-2021, 03:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TFM_UPD table
Post: RE: TFM_UPD table
|
Antti-L Wrote: (27-12-2021, 09:08 PM)
--
AkramS> Now I want in the MIG table of the later scenario file to change the invcost from 2050. Could this be a problem (that in the earlier scenario file th... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
18 |
16,160 |
28-12-2021, 01:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: TFM_UPD table
Post: RE: TFM_UPD table
|
Antti-L Wrote: (27-12-2021, 07:57 PM)
--
But still not working? How can that be possible? :shy: It sure does work here...
--
OK. Now I analysed the technology again. The invcost of technology i... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
18 |
16,160 |
27-12-2021, 08:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TFM_UPD table
Post: RE: TFM_UPD table
|
Antti-L Wrote: (27-12-2021, 07:32 PM)
--
Ok, I tested myself with a technology, which has its efficiencies defined in a scenario file.
I am seeing the TFM_MIG table working well, provided that the... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
18 |
16,160 |
27-12-2021, 07:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TFM_UPD table
Post: RE: TFM_UPD table
| Thanks!
Now I have tried and it works when a technology has been defined in a SUBRES file.
I have some technologies which their efficiencies or costs have been defined in one or two scenario fil... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
18 |
16,160 |
27-12-2021, 06:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TFM_UPD table
Post: RE: TFM_UPD table
|
Antti-L Wrote: (23-12-2021, 06:15 PM)
--
As Amit has not responded, perhaps I can give some small suggestions, even though I am no VEDA expert.
The "-0" in Year2 activates the Time-series filterin... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
18 |
16,160 |
27-12-2021, 01:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TFM_UPD table
Post: RE: TFM_UPD table
|
AKanudia Wrote: (21-12-2021, 10:09 PM)
--
Q1: why do you have the "-0" in year2 in the first half of the table?
Q2: what are you trying to achieve in the year=year2=2012 section?
--
A1: I am not f... |
|
AkramS |
TIMES
|
18 |
16,160 |
22-12-2021, 01:11 PM |
