Posts: 53
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2010
As I understand, FLO_FUNC is times-slice dependent whereas S_FLO_FUNC is only on an annual level. Correct?
If this is correct, is it possible to use S_FLO_FUNC together with FLO_FUNC values at a time-slice level?
For example: FLO_FUNC(Fall)+ S_FLO_FUNC(Annual)
I think it would be very convenient with a time slice dependent S_FLO_FUNC.
Posts: 53
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2010
It seem possible to use S_FLO_FUNC together with FLO_FUNC values at a time-slice level.
Posts: 392
Threads: 18
Joined: May 2010
Yes, right, it can be used together with any FLO_FUNC / ACT_EFF / FLO_EMIS / FLO_EFF /
ACT_FLO / EFF / CEFF / VDA_FLOP / INPUT / OUTPUT, at any timeslice level (ACT_FLO
is only supported in ANSWER, EFF / CEFF / VDA_FLOP / INPUT / OUTPUT are only supported
in VEDA-FE).
S_FLO_FUNC is one of the most complex parameter in TIMES, with respect to
implementation. Generalizing it to a timeslice-dependent variant might have
additional complications, and so I would not expect it to happen very soon,
unless there is wide common interest for it.
Posts: 53
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2010
Thank you for the fast response
Now I can combine S_FLO_FUNC with S_COM_FR to model what I want so there is no urgent need for a timeslice-dependent parameter.
