31-08-2021, 03:54 PM
(31-08-2021, 03:09 PM)Antti-L Wrote: It looks fine, but I cannot see your IE option. Do you have an option specified?
VS> I am not sure how we are defining the use of the second period in the above method.
You are defining the RHS for 2032. That's fine, the constraint will be generated at least for that year. To generate it for all years ≥ 2032, just specify the IE option 5.
If you have defined this in a separate scenario, maybe you can post the DDS file for that scenario, to check the constraint input data?
I think the problem was with the I/E value as from your earlier reply I took the I/E value of 2 and the model became infeasible. Now I am testing the model with an I/E value of 5. It is still solving (will take some time to solve) but looks like now it will be optimized.
Thank you Dr Antti.
Regards
Vinay Saini