Electrolyser Modelling
#27
(10-05-2019, 02:55 AM)Antti-L Wrote: Yes, it was easy to see that you have some strange mess up in your model. You are defining the following process type and primary group for HYGNSTG:
Code:
SET PRC_MAP /
REG1.DMD.HYGNSTG
/;

SET PRC_ACTUNT /
REG1.HYGNSTG.DEM.numberofcarkm
/;
Earlier, you defined the process of type PRE and with the primary group HYGN, which were fine. So, why did you change these definitions, for the worse? The process cannot have DEM as the PG, as it has no DEM commodities in the topology. Can you not revert these bad changes in the ~FI_Process table?

I tested with your original definitions, and got no QA_check warnings, and the HYGNSTG process worked ok.
Thank you Antti. In fact, what happened was that there was no gap between the  ~FI_Process table and ~FI_T table as seen in the snapshot attached. Although the PCG of HYGNSTG was declared as HYGN earlier, the PCG chosen by the code was DEM. Even if you have noticed, the description of the HYGNSTG process was that of the H2TRACAR because of this mess. So there was some error message appearing related to PCG. This made me change the PCG of all the processes into NRG (except demand technologies which I made to DEM) which is one of the default commodity groups mentioned in the TIMES documentation IV. Then, this time the warning message which I shared in the earlier post appeared (message related HYGNSTG). After you pointed out the PCG problem, I found out the excel sheet problem (of having no gap between tables) and ran the model. However, this only avoided the warning in the quality check, but the problem of not picking electrolyser, compressor technologies were still happening. The problem got solved when I changed the PCG of processes into their respective output commodities.

Now my problem is solved. But I am curious to know why those technologies were not being picked when the PCG of all processes except demand technologies (declared PCG as DEM) were declared as NRG. After I changed the PCG of each process into their respective output commodities (eg. HYGN for HYGNSTG), the model is working fine. Could you tell me why this was happening? I have attached the .run and .DD files of that version for your reference. Just now I tested the model without inputting anything in the commodity group. This was also working fine and it gave me the same results as that of the file where I inputted the PCG as their respective output commodities.

One more question. When should we declare the user defined PCG. I read in the documentation that it should be defined when the input commodity and output commodity of a process are different, it should be declared. In one example in the documentation, it was declared only in the ~FI_Process table. However, I have not seen any example in the documentation where user defined PCG was declared in the 'Commodity Group' tab of the SysSettings file. Could you also tell me when should we declare user defined PCG in this tab and how can we declare a user defined PCG in that tab, if say, I have two commodities in my PCG?

I hope what I explained is clear to you. Thanks in advance.


Attached Files
.zip   snapshot of no gap space between the tables.zip (Size: 62.77 KB / Downloads: 5)
.zip   ddnrunfiles1.zip (Size: 4.8 KB / Downloads: 3)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 08-04-2019, 02:43 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 08-04-2019, 03:33 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Pernille.S - 08-04-2019, 06:58 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 09-04-2019, 03:10 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 11-04-2019, 05:54 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 02-05-2019, 08:08 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 02-05-2019, 08:26 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 02-05-2019, 09:03 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 02-05-2019, 09:36 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 03-05-2019, 03:11 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 03-05-2019, 03:55 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 09-05-2019, 02:24 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 10-05-2019, 02:08 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 10-05-2019, 02:20 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 05-05-2019, 11:21 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 06-05-2019, 01:42 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Pernille.S - 06-05-2019, 05:58 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 06-05-2019, 07:51 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Pernille.S - 07-05-2019, 01:00 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Pernille.S - 08-05-2019, 02:21 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 08-05-2019, 02:31 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Pernille.S - 08-05-2019, 02:35 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 09-05-2019, 03:19 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 09-05-2019, 03:27 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 09-05-2019, 07:32 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 09-05-2019, 08:16 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 10-05-2019, 01:28 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 10-05-2019, 02:55 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 10-05-2019, 07:03 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 10-05-2019, 02:48 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 10-05-2019, 03:41 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 17-05-2019, 12:54 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 12-05-2019, 04:31 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 15-05-2019, 09:00 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 15-05-2019, 10:32 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 17-05-2019, 02:20 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 17-05-2019, 06:26 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 17-05-2019, 01:50 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 17-05-2019, 02:15 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 17-05-2019, 07:30 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 17-05-2019, 07:37 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 17-05-2019, 08:58 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 17-05-2019, 10:24 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 17-05-2019, 10:49 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 06-06-2019, 02:16 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 18-05-2019, 09:35 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 19-05-2019, 02:38 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 18-05-2019, 11:17 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 18-05-2019, 11:59 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 19-05-2019, 12:28 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 19-05-2019, 01:15 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Anjana - 19-05-2019, 01:19 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 19-05-2019, 01:34 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 06-06-2019, 10:25 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 12-06-2019, 02:58 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 12-06-2019, 02:05 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 06-07-2019, 01:15 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 06-07-2019, 04:06 AM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 08-07-2019, 02:44 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 08-07-2019, 04:11 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 08-07-2019, 04:18 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 08-07-2019, 05:34 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by Antti-L - 08-07-2019, 06:09 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 08-07-2019, 06:38 PM
RE: Electrolyser Modelling - by MohammedAbiAfthab - 29-08-2019, 05:17 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)