IEA-ETSAP Forum
Regarding S_FLO_FUNC - Printable Version

+- IEA-ETSAP Forum (http://iea-etsap.org/forum)
+-- Forum: Model Generators (http://iea-etsap.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Forum: TIMES (http://iea-etsap.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Regarding S_FLO_FUNC (/showthread.php?tid=73)



Regarding S_FLO_FUNC - Pernille.S - 16-01-2015

As I understand, FLO_FUNC is times-slice dependent whereas S_FLO_FUNC is only on an annual level. Correct?

If this is correct, is it possible to use S_FLO_FUNC together with FLO_FUNC values at a time-slice level?
For example: FLO_FUNC(Fall)+ S_FLO_FUNC(Annual)

I think it would be very convenient with a time slice dependent S_FLO_FUNC.



Regarding S_FLO_FUNC - Pernille.S - 16-01-2015

It seem possible to use S_FLO_FUNC together with FLO_FUNC values at a time-slice level.


Regarding S_FLO_FUNC - Antti-L - 16-01-2015

Yes, right, it can be used together with any FLO_FUNC / ACT_EFF / FLO_EMIS / FLO_EFF / ACT_FLO / EFF / CEFF / VDA_FLOP / INPUT / OUTPUT, at any timeslice level (ACT_FLO is only supported in ANSWER, EFF / CEFF / VDA_FLOP / INPUT / OUTPUT are only supported in VEDA-FE).

S_FLO_FUNC is one of the most complex parameter in TIMES, with respect to implementation. Generalizing it to a timeslice-dependent variant might have additional complications, and so I would not expect it to happen very soon, unless there is wide common interest for it.




Regarding S_FLO_FUNC - Pernille.S - 19-01-2015

Thank you for the fast response

Now I can combine S_FLO_FUNC with S_COM_FR to model what I want so there is no urgent need for a timeslice-dependent parameter.